Skip to main content

Ross Geller is a terrible palaeontologist.


When all of the seasons of Friends were released on Netflix this winter, many of us took the opportunity to catch up on a show from our 90s childhoods. But when I did I couldn’t help but be struck by how awful its characters could be to others within the TV universe, Ross most of all. Many of Ross’ shenanigans were related to his job as a palaeontologist, first at a natural history museum and then as a lecturer (later tenured) at NYU. Ross is a terrible person, and that bleeds into him being a terrible palaeontologist & professor. Binge-watching the series really drives this home, as you can see from this parade of professional nonsense:

-He has an after-hours date, then sex, in the museum and gets caught the morning after by kids on a field trip.
-He yells at and threatens his museum coworkers, leading to a forced leave of absence while he undergoes anger management training.
-His papers are widely discredited.
-He forgets to attend his own classes (this running gag usually happens when they're all sitting around the coffee shop).
-He dated an undergraduate former student (which was not technically prohibited but is frowned up) and he concealed it from his colleagues and her father.
-He abandoned a new department hire he was meant to take on a tour of the city because the other new hire was an attractive woman.
--He is a boring lecturer, terrible marker (he doesn’t read his students’ papers), and gets manipulated into improving students’ grades. His poor teaching earns him terrible evaluations at the end of term.
-He conned his way (after the organizer falls asleep) into giving the keynote speech at a major conference (the speech itself was full of platitudes, but many keynotes are).
-He can’t organize a commute between 2 areas of campus in time to teach 2 courses in one day, or request that one of the courses change time/location, or anything a reasonable teacher would do. Instead, rollerblades!
-He steals from his museum to bribe people for favours.

Buzzfeed even has a post delving into the specific reasons it's unlikely that Ross could have the career he does on Friends.

He was, however, a good TV example of a regular (if angry) person who happens to have a scientific job, as opposed to a scientist who isn't at all like a regular person. His frustrations with his less scientifically-minded friends make you temporarily forget how awful he is (like the many times Phoebe argues that her new-age beliefs in telepathy, psychic senses, etc. are as valid as his scientific outlook). And to be fair, he is put in terrible professional situations so that his rageful self can be unloosed for comedic effect (like having his girlfriend’s Nobel Prize-winning ex be the one who decides whether his project will be funded).

But he isn't a very good palaeontologist.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to attend a conference with a baby

Preamble: the title of this post officially "gives it away": I'm ABD with a B-A-B-Y. Most everyone I interact with professionally knows this, and I wasn't keeping it secret from the internet , but there's still a disadvantage to being a  mother in academia , and many hesitate to talk about being parents publicly. I think that's unreasonable, and I hope that this and similar posts can be helpful to other academic parents facing similar issues. Last week my family attended HSS / PSA in windy Chicago, and it was a great example of a conference that took families with babies into consideration. My next post will be about the good choices those conference organizers made, but this one is directed towards the parent(s) conferencing with a baby in tow (note: some of these tips may not apply to multiple/older children or other types of dependent care, areas in which I'm not experienced). 1. Be baby-travel savvy.   There are plenty of usefu...

A cold day in Ottawa

On Friday, January 25th, York University Science & Technology Studies graduate students from Katey Anderson ’s Science & Technology as Material Culture course (plus a few hangers-on, including yours truly) got a behind-the-scenes tour of the artifacts at the Canadian Science & Technology Museum , courtesy of David Pantalony . The grounds of the CSTM David Pantalony (right) and the muddy-footed tour group  We checked out the collections in storage, as well as the “artifacts in the wild” on display to the public. In addition to performing material analyses of artifacts, we explored storage warehouses, skulked around in backstage areas off-limits to the public, and toured the museum’s library. In this post I’ll describe our time at the CSTM, as well as David’s approach to artifacts, material culture, and his curatorial work. The storage warehouse An exciting... something. The CSTM is a little off the beaten track as far as Ottawa’s museums go. L...

Thinking about Generous Thinking

Everyone is talking about Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s new book Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University . Mark Largent, our Interim APUE & Dean of Undergraduate Studies, just blogged about it here . Fitzpatrick gave a keynote about generous thinking at the #ITeachMSU Spring Conference on Student Learning and Success . And it’s the next pick for the Hub’s monthly book club . I haven’t read the whole book yet, but the ideas are so exciting that this is a book pre-report, as one of my favorite colleagues Bre Yaklin remarked last week. I first learned about Generous Thinking at the Envisioning the Future of Academic Work at MSU  workshop in April, where Fitzpatrick led a breakout session called “Generous vs. Competitive Thinking in the Academic Environment.” Anyone who knows me knows I’m the opposite of competitive, so this title jumped out of the schedule for me. In essence, thinking generously means rescuing academia from paths that seem to relentlessly i...