Skip to main content

Putting together a panel

Here are my tips for putting together a successful panel for an academic conference. Committees are happy to get panel applications rather than individual abstracts because it means less work for them. These are simple tips that have worked for me in the past. Your experiences may differ, of course, depending on your field of study and the particular conference, the vicissitudes of the conference committee, and the "trendiness" of the topics that year.

-Find another person whose work and your own have the same broader subject matter or approach. It helps if they are from a different institution or department from your own, but it's not necessary. Don't be afraid to venture outside your own level: professors and postdocs and grad students can happily be housed together. I have found it best when you are at least acquainted beforehand.

-Ask them to join your panel. If yes, you are now a twosome, and it gets easier. (If no, repeat step one.)

-Brainstorm for (an)other speaker(s) to complement your panel. This can be the most difficult part. Who will be able to round out the potentially narrow appeal of your twosome? Who will add a historical, analytic, or material dimension to the treatment of the topic? Who is available and hasn't already been scooped up by another panel? Don't be afraid to dream big or to approach people you haven't met in person yet. Often they will be flattered to be asked, and since there are already two of you, you will seem to have momentum. If they aren't available, don't be afraid to ask if they can recommend anyone else. Keep at this until you have the number of panelists you need.

-Think about each other's work and how it can come together in a way that makes sense as a whole. What areas of commonality are there? Are there broader questions that you're all addressing in your own way? If the panel application requires a description of the panel as a whole, this will be useful.

-Have each panel member give you an abstract, put them together, and submit your application before the deadline. Make sure that you follow the instructions in the CFP. This can include format issues, making sure to blind your submission, etc. Also make sure that the email gets sent (I know someone who missed out on a conference because his abstract got stuck in his email outbox...)

-Wait for the conference's decision. Good luck with this part.

-Once you are accepted, stay in touch with your panelists. There are often logistics to work out: who will chair the panel? How long will the talks be? Will your question period(s) come after each talk or at the end? Depending on the conference, you will have more or less opportunity to shape the session exactly the way you want to. It's also good to clarify whether everyone will bring a laptop or whether you'll use a shared one, whether you have A/V needs, etc.

-Try to arrange a face-to-face meeting at the conference before your session. This helps you recognize each other before the day of your session and bring each other up to speed on any changes to your papers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to attend a conference with a baby

Preamble: the title of this post officially "gives it away": I'm ABD with a B-A-B-Y. Most everyone I interact with professionally knows this, and I wasn't keeping it secret from the internet , but there's still a disadvantage to being a  mother in academia , and many hesitate to talk about being parents publicly. I think that's unreasonable, and I hope that this and similar posts can be helpful to other academic parents facing similar issues. Last week my family attended HSS / PSA in windy Chicago, and it was a great example of a conference that took families with babies into consideration. My next post will be about the good choices those conference organizers made, but this one is directed towards the parent(s) conferencing with a baby in tow (note: some of these tips may not apply to multiple/older children or other types of dependent care, areas in which I'm not experienced). 1. Be baby-travel savvy.   There are plenty of usefu

Ross Geller is a terrible palaeontologist.

When all of the seasons of Friends were released on Netflix this winter, many of us took the opportunity to catch up on a show from our 90s childhoods. But when I did I couldn’t help but be struck by how awful its characters could be to others within the TV universe, Ross most of all. Many of Ross’ shenanigans were related to his job as a palaeontologist, first at a natural history museum and then as a lecturer (later tenured ) at NYU. Ross is a terrible person, and that bleeds into him being a terrible palaeontologist & professor. Binge-watching the series really drives this home, as you can see from this parade of professional nonsense: -He has an after-hours date, then sex , in the museum and gets caught the morning after by kids on a field trip. -He yells at and threatens his museum coworkers, leading to a forced leave of absence while he undergoes anger management training. -His papers are widely discredited . -He forgets to attend his own classes (this runni

Thinking about Generous Thinking

Everyone is talking about Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s new book Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University . Mark Largent, our Interim APUE & Dean of Undergraduate Studies, just blogged about it here . Fitzpatrick gave a keynote about generous thinking at the #ITeachMSU Spring Conference on Student Learning and Success . And it’s the next pick for the Hub’s monthly book club . I haven’t read the whole book yet, but the ideas are so exciting that this is a book pre-report, as one of my favorite colleagues Bre Yaklin remarked last week. I first learned about Generous Thinking at the Envisioning the Future of Academic Work at MSU  workshop in April, where Fitzpatrick led a breakout session called “Generous vs. Competitive Thinking in the Academic Environment.” Anyone who knows me knows I’m the opposite of competitive, so this title jumped out of the schedule for me. In essence, thinking generously means rescuing academia from paths that seem to relentlessly incre