Skip to main content

"Both Sides" Now

Apologies for this post being a little later than I'd have liked, but I've been under a cloud of "blegh" for the past week and it's been difficult to get anything done. Like having a lingering cold, except instead of sneezing you don't have the energy to do anything except watch season 3 of Star Trek: The Next Generation.

In this week's roundup over at The Bubble Chamber I wrote about some new research exposing the potential pitfalls of sexual stereotyping, and linked to the disastrous EC's "Science: It's a Girl Thing" video (which was so offputting when released this past summer that it immediately went viral). Fortunately, the marketing for the EC's continued "Science: It's a Girl Thing" campaign seems to have overcome its initial pinkwashing and now features girl models doing more than strutting the catwalk: taking pictures, standing in front of blackboards, and daydreaming.

Writing about "Science: It's a Girl Thing" brought to mind an incident from a few weeks ago that also involved gender stereotypes and science.

These are two of the ads from Brock University's "Both Sides of the Brain" campaign, and the only two I've seen on any Toronto subway, bus, or streetcar. I wasn't totally sold on the first ads I encountered, since I didn't really understand how half of someone's face and an image of their research interests corresponded to 2 sides of anything. But after seeing the second one, I began to worry about the connotations of showing women's faces as "one side" and math/science as "the other side." So, following my friend Brooke's example of writing to complain about a commercial he found troubling, I tracked down Brock's Marketing and Communications division and sent them this email:
I live in Toronto and I'm a subway commuter on the TTC. Recently I have noticed two of Brock's "For both sides of the brain" campaign on subway cars. It seems as though all of your posters on the TTC involve half of a female student's face and the other half a science- or technology-based image (a cyberspace brain, or a chalkboard full of equations). There's an unfortunate connotation that the two sides of the brain are the female side and the math/science side. A quick Google search showed me that there are more images in the campaign, but I have not seen any of them in Toronto.

I am very interested in the way science is represented to the public, and I'd appreciate any response about this campaign.
The next day I received the following reply:
Thanks for your note.  I'm glad that Brock's Both Sides of the Brain materials are catching your eye, that was certainly our intention. 

I think your perceptions about the BSB campaign are distorted by the coincidence that both of the 2 ads you saw involve women and math-science themes.   

The BSB campaign has been running for several years and has featured dozens of Brock students, faculty, supporters and alumni, male and female. The artwork depicting the "other side" for our subjects covers a wide swath of subjects, and does not pigeon-hole either gender with any particular theme. You will see a few examples at

However, we have purposely put a scientific emphasis in the 2012-13 edition of the campaign because Brock recently opened the world-class Cairns Family Health and Bioscience Research Complex, and we are drawing the public's attention to new opportunities for study and discovery as a result of this gem.  In fact, earlier this week the Globe and Mail distributed a magazine about research at Brock, which was largely centred on the Cairns Complex.  You can see an online version of the magazine at

I hope this addresses your concerns. Thanks again for writing.
It's true that clicking the first link brings up all kinds of different examples of smiling half-faced people. I'm not entirely convinced that there aren't any latent stereotypes at play (women are juxtaposed with fruit/children's faces/yoga poses/docile animals, men with angry hockey faces/predatory animals) but after giving it some thought I think the real problem with this campaign is that their "both sides" theme might not be doing all it could for Brock.

As I said earlier, each photo is half of a person's face, with the other half represented by an image of their research or an important cause or hobby. But nothing about the images suggests "both sides" of anything, except the fact of there being two halves. If Brock is trying to market itself as a university where students can develop multiple interests ("both sides" of their brains), why do they only show one thing the student is into? Why not show music AND sports, the debate team AND drama class? Why not show a student engaged in two different things, using "both sides" of their brain?

I don't know very much about Brock, but I do think the undergraduate years are a wonderful time for students to explore all of their interests, even the ones they didn't know they had until they got there. Brock might just need to get over this "both sides" campaign to really showcase the well-rounded lives of its community members.


Popular posts from this blog

Ross Geller is a terrible palaeontologist.

When all of the seasons of Friends were released on Netflix this winter, many of us took the opportunity to catch up on a show from our 90s childhoods. But when I did I couldn’t help but be struck by how awful its characters could be to others within the TV universe, Ross most of all. Many of Ross’ shenanigans were related to his job as a palaeontologist, first at a natural history museum and then as a lecturer (later tenured) at NYU. Ross is a terrible person, and that bleeds into him being a terrible palaeontologist & professor. Binge-watching the series really drives this home, as you can see from this parade of professional nonsense:
-He has an after-hours date, then sex, in the museum and gets caught the morning after by kids on a field trip. -He yells at and threatens his museum coworkers, leading to a forced leave of absence while he undergoes anger management training. -His papers are widely discredited. -He forgets to attend his own classes (this running gag usually happens w…

YouTube Playlist of Wildlife Film Clips

Here is a playlist of clips I showed in a guest lecture for Megan Halpern's Intro to History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science course at Michigan State. I used clips from wildlife films, trailers, behind-the-scenes features, and the CBC Fifth Estate documentary Cruel Camera. The most popular clip was the viral sensation Iguana vs Snakes from Planet Earth II (2016)Enjoy!

How to attend a conference with a baby

Preamble: the title of this post officially "gives it away": I'm ABD with a B-A-B-Y. Most everyone I interact with professionally knows this, and I wasn't keeping it secret from the internet, but there's still a disadvantage to being a mother in academia, and many hesitate to talk about being parents publicly. I think that's unreasonable, and I hope that this and similar posts can be helpful to other academic parents facing similar issues.
Last week my family attended HSS/PSA in windy Chicago, and it was a great example of a conference that took families with babies into consideration. My next post will be about the good choices those conference organizers made, but this one is directed towards the parent(s) conferencing with a baby in tow (note: some of these tips may not apply to multiple/older children or other types of dependent care, areas in which I'm not experienced).
1. Be baby-travel savvy. There are plenty of usefulresources out there for parents…